Federal drug laws produce a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you might consider Pablo Escobar or Walter White, however the reality is that under federal law, drug traffickers consist of people who purchase pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealership; act as intermediary in a series of small deals; and even pick up a travel suitcase for the wrong friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be subject to the very same serious compulsory minimum sentences.
To the men and ladies who drafted our federal drug laws in 1986, this may come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the reason to connect five- and ten-year obligatory sentences to drug trafficking was to penalize "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are truly running these operations", and the mid-level dealerships.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, practically everybody convicted of a federal drug criminal activity is founded guilty of "drug trafficking", which more often than not results in a minimum of a five- or ten-year obligatory jail sentence. That's a lot of time in federal jail for many individuals who are minor parts of drug trade, the large bulk of whom are men and women of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he handles a lot of drug cases., I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal jail for mandatory minimum sentences varying from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't convey the ridiculous tragedy of everything. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I just recently sentenced a group of more than twenty accused on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. All of them plead guilty. Eighteen were 'tablet smurfers,' as federal prosecutors put it, indicating their role totaled up to regularly buying and providing cold medicine to meth cookers in exchange for really small, low-grade amounts to feed their severe dependencies. The majority of were out of work or underemployed. Numerous were single mothers. They did not offer or directly disperse meth; there were no stockpiles of cash, guns or counter surveillance devices. Yet all of them dealt with obligatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They found that in 2005, the majority of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking defendants-- guys and ladies explained as "street-level dealers", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got five- or ten-year necessary prison sentences. This is especially real for crack-cocaine offenders, most of whom are black; regardless of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, offering a small quantity of fracture drug (28 grams) brings the same obligatory minimum sentence-- 5 years-- as offering 500 grams of powder cocaine.
This is the reality for which advocates of severe federal drug laws must account. We should admit that our sentencing of minor individuals in the drug trade to prison terms implied for the leaders of big drug companies-- as a typical occurrence, not as an exception.
If prolonged compulsory www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ minimum sentences for nonviolent drug addicts in fact worked, one might be able to rationalize them. I have seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of young children parent less and thousands of aging, infirm and dying parents childless.
Here, again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is best: long necessary sentences are unneeded for a lot of drug transgressors. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York rescinded compulsory sentences for drug transgressors and gave judges the power to impose shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
He has actually seen necessary laws composed for the most severe, massive drug dealers used to the males and females on the most affordable rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it occur a lot. We when pictured that severe mandatory sentences would be used to deal with the leaders of large drug operations.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777